So very true. In an age where authorities are constantly claiming to censor voices in order to "protect the vulnerable", there is the very real risk of state endorsed and curated messaging becoming the only narrative.
Protecting the vulnerable is the wolf in sheep's clothing. It seems such a noble, naturally good endeavour, that no sane person would deny it. Most will clamour to support it, but few will scrutinise the proposal or it's rollout.
So very true. In an age where authorities are constantly claiming to censor voices in order to "protect the vulnerable", there is the very real risk of state endorsed and curated messaging becoming the only narrative.
Protecting the vulnerable is the wolf in sheep's clothing. It seems such a noble, naturally good endeavour, that no sane person would deny it. Most will clamour to support it, but few will scrutinise the proposal or it's rollout.